
A self-supervised ViT can predict depth from a single image with no 3D supervision at all. That’s usually treated as one fact. A recent paper asks a sharper question: is that geometry sitting in a few clean directions the network can read out directly, or is it smeared across the whole feature space, waiting for a powerful decoder to untangle it?
Reading notes on Zhou et al., Understanding Geometric Representations in Self-Supervised Vision Transformers via Subspace Intervention · arXiv:2607.01987
Most evaluations of vision transformers stop at a single number: how well does a probe trained on top of frozen features perform? If it’s high, we say the model “understands” geometry. If it’s low, we shrug, maybe the information isn’t there, maybe it’s just hard to extract. This paper doesn’t accept that shrug. It opens the probe up and asks what it’s actually made of.